April 25, 2022

Here’s Lookin’ at Euclid

Why was Euclid so Great?

Dr. Kim Johnson at The Lukeion Project

Educators at The Lukeion Project include some great Classical authors in their courses: Cicero, Plato, Tacitus, Sophocles…the list goes on! But one Classical author stands above them all. More versions of his work have been published than any work other than the Bible. He’s been read almost continuously for more than 2,000 years. Knowledge of his work has been considered the mark of an educated person in Rome, Baghdad, London, and Athens. When Abraham Lincoln would enjoy circuit rides through the Illinois countryside, he would bring two books: the Bible and this work. This author was a topic of one Edna St. Vincent Millay’s sonnets. Who is this celebrated author?

He was a mathematician!  Euclid of Alexandria (Εὐκλείδης, which means "renowned, glorious"), 325-265 BC, wrote The Elements. This work not only changed the course of mathematics, but it also changed the way people think of logic and argument forever afterwards.

Who was Euclid, and what were The Elements?

The truth is that we don’t really know much about the personal life of Euclid. He came to work in the library at Alexandria around the time Ptolemy II, Hellenistic monarch of Egypt, was expanding it. We don’t know where he was originally from, although he is possibly one of the few Alexandria natives who came to fame at the library.

We have a few stories written many years after Euclid’s life. When he was teaching Ptolemy geometry, the king asked if there was a shorter way. Euclid responded scornfully, “There is no royal road to mathematics.” When one of his students asked, “When will I ever use this?” (a cry common to modern mathematics students), Euclid responded, “Give the boy some money, for he has to see some profit come from this work.”  Mostly, we have Euclid’s masterwork, The Elements.

The Elements is a collection of 13 books (really chapters) collecting most of the Greek knowledge of geometry up to Euclid’s time. Euclid himself did not discover most of the theorems in this book. He simply collected and organized them but the way he organized them was unique.

Previously, Greek mathematicians who wanted to prove something would list the assumptions they were making. They ran into the problem experienced by modern geometry students: what you can assume, and when? After all, you wouldn’t want to prove that the angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees while inadvertently assuming that very thing. This would be circular reasoning and a fallacy. Euclid’s method avoided such problems by starting with almost nothing and assuming only things that he had previously proven.

The Elements’ starting point included definitions, common notions, and postulates. Definitions are important for any practitioner of logic: Before statements and arguments, one must make the terms precise. Common notions were meant to be clear without proof. For example, things which are equal to the same thing are also equal to each other. Postulates were slightly more complicated but self-evident. After making clear his assumptions, Euclid cataloged much of Greek mathematics. Each theorem was based on the theorems stated before. He included the steps of the proof and diagrams (including labels) to make his reasoning clear. He began with theorems about triangles and parallel lines (precisely where modern geometry students start) and ended proving that there are exactly 5 platonic solids, the primes are infinite, and some numbers are irrational.

This is not to say that Euclid was perfect in 200 BC. Over the years his proofs were corrected, and some of the corrected proofs became part of the canon. His postulates were not enough to prove all his theorems so in the 19th century more postulates and notions were added. The most stunning change came in 1832, when Janos Bolyai and Nicolas Lobachevsky proved that if you change the 5th postulate you get an entirely new geometry. Over all his theories held, and The Elements spread far and wide.

What came before Euclid?

Certainly, people did math before Euclid and without Euclid. The Babylonians had a number system in 2000 BC which would not be surpassed in Europe until after the 1200s when place value and the use of zero started overtaking inefficient Roman numerals. The ancient Egyptians clearly had a solid grasp on geometry. Just look at the pyramids which are still a wonder of the world! Indian mathematics predating Euclid were very advanced and included negative numbers, complicated computations, and zero was considered a number. Chinese mathematicians worked out theories of solving systems of equations, solving polynomials, Pascal’s triangle, and the Pythagorean theorem all without Euclid.

Although these mathematicians made great advancements, Euclid still stands out. These other mathematicians weren’t interested in making their mathematics accessible to the public. Perhaps they didn’t think it was necessary. Perhaps they wanted to keep their secrets to guarantee their future employment or the exclusivity of the scribe and priest class. But most of their work was published with the problem, the solution, and perhaps a method for solving it. Euclid was accessible to anyone willing to put in the work.

The other characteristic of mathematics in other cultures without Euclid was that they were interested in showing solutions to specific problems. Although an intelligent reader could generalize, the writings of mathematicians before and without Euclid would use specific values for the lengths of sides, radii, and other calculations. They did not show the general solution.

What changed after Euclid?

First, most of the old geometry books were destroyed. It’s hard to find any geometry books written before Euclid. Euclid’s work is the only one cited for basic theorems about geometry.

Euclid’s The Elements spread everywhere. For example, there are potsherds with references to his work found at a military outpost found near the Nile plus copies of his book from personal libraries in Babylon and Constantinople. Euclid’s work spread to Baghdad in the 700s, England in the 1000s, and eventually to India and China. Euclid’s work was not a secret but something that anyone could work through and discover for himself. Judging by the computations written in the margins of many ancient copies, some readers were more successful than others.

Euclid’s method was adopted for many other mathematical, scientific, and philosophical efforts. Think about the other variations on The Elements that have been written over 2000 years, including the Elements of Theology by Proclus in the 5th century AD to the Elements of Style by Strunk and White in the 20th century. When Descartes wrote “I think, therefore I am,” he was using Euclid’s method of eliminating all extraneous assumptions to reach the most basic statements we can affirm.

Reading Euclid and learning to think logically came to be one of the cornerstones of a good education. From when it became one of the four liberal arts in the Middle Ages until every schoolchild in England had to pass the “pons asinorum.” Knowing Euclid was essential to training one’s brain to think logically. This is why Lincoln studied Euclid and used his reasoning as an example in a debate against Stephen Douglas. This is why Edna St. Vincent Millay wrote, “Euclid alone has looked on beauty bare.”  Anyone who builds or measures, who makes arguments from first principles, or uses science built on any mathematics that came after Euclid, is ultimately referring to Euclid. That’s why Euclid is so great.

The Elements concentrated on building knowledge up from the smallest possible number of assumptions. He wasn’t just interested in knowing what was true, but how you could be sure that you knew it. In addition, Euclid didn’t just solve one problem, he solved them all. One of the previous mathematicians might notice that 3^2+4^2=5^2. Euclid proved that for all right triangles, the square of the hypotenuse was equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.

In The Lukeion Project course Counting to Computers: Math from the Dawn of Time to the Digital Age, we investigate the connections between the great mathematicians of the past and the mathematics we learn today. Whether you love, hate, or are indifferent to the standard course of math study, if you are interested in learning more about why we do things the way we do them today, how they were invented in the first place, and the people who were involved, come join us Wednesday afternoons this fall! 

April 11, 2022

Do You Need Latin Before Learning Greek?

By Regan Barr with The Lukeion Project

At a recent homeschool conference, we were approached by a mother whose daughter desperately wanted to take Classical Greek. Another exhibitor had told her that she shouldn’t take Greek until she’d had several years of Latin. The daughter was devastated! She wanted to read Greek literature, not Roman!

The cynical side of me believes that this poor advice came from someone trying to sell a Latin curriculum, but perhaps there are those who truly believe that all languages start with the study of Latin. It’s certainly true that the study of any romance language will profit from a healthy understanding of Latin grammar, syntax, vocabulary, and morphology, but Latin is in not a prerequisite for the study of Classical Greek. Here are some reasons why your student doesn’t need Latin to start Greek:

Chronologically, Greek is attested much earlier than Latin and is therefore not derived from it. The earliest written Greek, Mycenaean Linear B, dates to around 1450 BC. It used a combination of syllabic and pictorial characters rather than the Greek alphabet used from the Archaic period until the present. In 1952, Michael Ventris and John Chadwick deciphered this script and demonstrated conclusively that Linear B was truly Greek. In comparison, the earliest known Latin inscription, the Praeneste Fibula, is from about 650 BC, 800 years later. This inscription on a piece of jewelry simply records the name of the craftsman and the name of the owner. The Iliad and Odyssey were produced a century before this earliest known Latin inscription.

Greek uses a different alphabet than our own, and that is not necessarily a bad thing. If you or your student were the ones pouring over Tolkien appendices and learning to write in Dwarven runes, Greek could be right up your alley! Just as the strange alphabet can be intimidating to some, it can be intriguing to others. When Greece was plunged into its Dark Age at the end of the Mycenaean period, writing and the Linear B characters that went with it were forgotten, but the language continued to be spoken. Written Greek would reemerge in the Archaic period using phonetic characters borrowed from the Phoenician alphabet that are still used in Greek today. Homer and Hesiod wrote in this re-invented alphabet, and many students today enjoy the novelty of it.

Latin and Greek are both highly inflected languages: word forms change to reflect the role they play in a sentence. In this regard, however, Greek is no more confounding than Latin. In fact, Greek has fewer declensions and cases, and roughly the same number of tenses (discounting the rare future perfect in Greek). Studying either Classical language will connect new synapses in a student’s brain and force new logic into their thinking.

Never discount passion and motivation! A student who yearns to learn something should not be discouraged without good reason. Just as some students long to read Julius Caesar, Cicero, and Ovid in the original language, others yearn to read Euripides, Aristotle, and the New Testament. Passion and desire are half the battle in education; don’t throw that away! We’ve all been forced to sit in a classroom that held no interest to us; don’t force students out of a classroom they really want to be in.

Both Classical languages are equally respected on a high school transcript and each will help you in picking up the other. Once a student understands inflection, cases, morphology, etc., picking up the next language becomes a bit easier. We’re often asked if students should study both languages at the same time. Why not?? Our advice is for the student to begin with the one that intrigues them most, and after a year they can dive into the other one. Chances are good that they won’t need quite as much time to pick up the second one.

In short, if your student has a craving for ancient Greek, feed that craving! It will open a world of exciting and important literature to them, from history and drama to philosophy and faith.


April 4, 2022

Learn the Rules and Tools for Good Academic Writing

Focus, Development, Organization, Sources, Technique, Editing

 By Randee Baty at The Lukeion Project

    “My teacher just doesn’t like my writing style!” I remember my daughter coming home from college with this complaint about her English professor.

    Most writing instructors and professors don’t care about style, at least not as students think about "writing style.” Those that evaluate student writing for a living have fairly objective criteria for judging a student’s work, whether it is creative, academic, or any other type of writing. Parents and students alike can learn to apply the same criteria to any writing project to see if something is objectively well-written or poorly written.

    Writing instructors, at least the kind most likely to help build strong student writing skills, typically use rubrics to grade writing. If they don’t use a rubric, they have some sort of checklist that keeps them focused on objectively analyzing student writing. Our rubric for research writing at The Lukeion Project has six criteria: focus, development, organization, use of sources, technique, and editing. These guideposts provide clear goals for students to meet without worrying whether the instructor “likes” their “style” or even agrees with their conclusions!

Focus

    The paper should relentlessly focus on the prompt given. For instance, if a student is asked to analyze Moby-Dick, they are not being asked for a biography of Herman Melville. That is extraneous information unless something in Moby-Dick specifically relates to the author’s life. Then the student would need to give enough information to relate those elements together, but not more. Analyze the prompt, know what you are being asked, and don’t stray away from the prompt as you devise your answer. If you do, the instructor will deduct points because of a lack of focus. Well-written papers are focused.

Development   

    Whatever point the writer wishes to make requires evidence or analytical reasoning to back it up. Unsupported statements or claims will not fly in academic writing. If a student says that Julius Caesar was an ambitious leader on his way to becoming a tyrant, he must provide plenty of evidence to support his conclusion. The student can’t, like Brutus and Cassius, simply make guesses about Caesar’s plans. Students should give examples of his behavior and use analysis of his behavior and accomplishments to make their point. Vague thoughts or feelings won’t work. It’s all about evidence and analysis. Whether or not the instructor agrees with conclusions does not matter in the paper’s grade as long as the writer has strong support and evidence to back up the argument. Well-written papers have evidence and analysis to support the author’s point.

Organization

    A good paper will have proper essay structure, paragraph structure, and reasonable progression through the argument being made. The essay needs to begin with an introduction that ends in a thesis statement. Well-developed body paragraphs must follow with relevant evidence. Evidence and analysis must relate back to the thesis statement without getting off track. The conclusion should tie all the evidence together and answer the “so what?” test (your readers should never wonder “so what?” after reading your work).

    Paragraphs should begin with a topic sentence, and everything in that paragraph must relate to that topic sentence. One point of the student’s argument must logically follow the previous point. If a student argues that settling Mars is too expensive for NASA to consider, she shouldn’t follow that conclusion by listing the benefits of settling Mars. Simply following logical thought-progressions will go a long way to improve a good analytical project. Check through the paper to ensure it progresses in an organized manner toward the conclusion. Well-written papers are organized and flow from one point to the next.

Excellent Sources

  Use sources appropriate to the paper. Always use them in a way that enhances the argument rather than hijacking it. Always cite the sources are appropriately. Appropriate sources offer credibility to the written project, but students struggle to understand what sources trustworthy and which ones are best left out. For example, some hobbyist’s blog or opinion piece won’t offer much credibility but a source written by a person with a proven academic track record as an expert in the topic will be best for a good academic assignment. Check the credentials of the writer so you are only using the best and most reliable expert sources. If you can’t tell who the author is or find out that author’s background in that subject area, don’t use that source! 

Works that are older than about 25 years should be used with caution on many academic topics to avoid using out-of-date information. Only use an older source if you can verify that that source is foundational and formative for an understanding of your subject matter. If you aren’t aware how much more we’ve come to know about most subjects over the last 25 years, you are the perfect candidate to avoid all older academic sources! In that span of time, we’ve gone from email being new and optional to vast libraries of data being accessible at every laptop in mere seconds after a few keystrokes. Most 16-year-old writers can’t appreciate what data-accessibility has done to change the shape of research in the last two decades. Parents, here’s where you get to entertain your student with stories about life before technology!   

Once you accumulate several reliable researchers in your subject matter, don’t let those sources replace the point that you want to make. Quoting extensively from a biography on J.R.R. Tolkien must never replace the argument you were supposed to be making on the influences of Finnish authors on The Lord of the Rings. Quotations or information from any source must enhance what the student has already observed from their reading of Tolkien. Don’t let one (or two or three) sources hijack a paper. An author must always do her own analysis. Too many quotations turn the paper into a wiki rather than an academic research paper and will show the instructor that you are more focused on hitting the word-count rather than examining and analyzing relevant information.  

Part of using sources well is mastering how to cite sources well. Citing your sources is a foundational principle in academic writing but it strikes fear in the heart of student and parent alike primarily due to a lack of experience with citation. The good news is this: methods for citing are set. Students should learn either MLA or APA formatting as early as possible during late middle school and high school. MLA is the most used formatting method in the humanities and by most colleges. Various resources are available to help students learn these methods but writing that doesn’t cite sources will be graded very harshly. Good writing uses sources must support rather than hijack an argument and all sources must be cited whether they are being quoted or employed to supply any relevant data.

Technique

There are several essential writing conventions that young authors must learn, master, and employ evermore. These are the basic rules of academic writing. These techniques are fairly different from casual writing (like this blog) or creative composition. Being aware of these academic writing laws show that the student writer comprehends the task well and is writing skillfully.  These are things that can be objectively graded because good writing uses the techniques expected when one scholar writes to another. Here are a few of the biggies on the list of academic writing laws:

  • Always write in third person (he, she, it, they) with no first (I, we) or second person (you) ever appearing in any academic writing.
  • Keep writing concise. Use no unnecessary words such as “very,” “interestingly,” “in conclusion,” “furthermore,” or “really.” In fact, simply eliminate 95% of your modifiers and intensifiers. They always clutter and conceal rather than enhance. You might arrive at your word count faster by including them, but your work will be judged more harshly.
  • Remove all slang, cliches, or casual language. There’s plenty of room in casual and creative writing for these things. They don’t belong in academic writing.
  • Keep the writing in an academic tone while you avoid sounding pompous or pretentious.
  • Use the shortest word that fits the sentence rather than the longest word (use “use” rather than utilize “utilize.”). The reader should be able to read without stumbling over difficult constructions or long rambling sentences with too many clauses.

Proofreading

         Employ proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar always. Use proper formatting according to MLA, APA, or whatever format the instructor requires (and remember that everything in a paper is formatted). Edit your work several times before handing it off to somebody else to read. If you really want to catch all errors, have that person read your work out loud to you. No matter how many times you edit your work by reading it silently to yourself, an objective reader will always find areas that need work.

         As you can read, nothing here says anything about “style” per se. Grading for academic work is clear-cut and nothing is subjective or based on mood, whim, or personality. If you get a lower-than-preferred score, it is because one or more of these areas are lacking, not because the instructor dislikes your style. By focusing on these aspects, you’ll be able to objectively help your student--or help yourself--become a better writer.

 

Keep Technology Caged

AI Isn’t Your Academic Friend By Amy Barr with The Lukeion Project At least in theory, students can now grab their essay or paper prompt f...